"Quousque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra?"

"How long, Catiline, will you abuse our patience?"

In Catilinam I.1

Manuale

A Guide to the Instrument

How to use the Cicero Score — and what it is for.

Why this exists

Eloquence, made measurable

For two millennia, Western political speech was trained against a single book — Cicero's De Oratore. We lost the habit of reading speeches against that standard. The Cicero Score puts the rubric back on the table: eight dimensions, three officia, real Latin parallels, and a score that invites argument rather than ends it.

Think of it as a literacy device. Where a music critic hears voice-leading, this instrument helps you hear periodus, amplificatio, contentio — the structures Cicero named and the canon imitated.

How to use it

  1. 01

    Find a speech

    Choose any oration: a presidential address, a commencement speech, a corporate keynote, a sermon, a courtroom statement. Length 50–40,000 characters.

  2. 02

    Paste the full text

    Open the Analyze page, give the speech a title (speaker + occasion is ideal), and paste the transcript. Cleaner text yields cleaner readings.

  3. 03

    Compute the Cicero Score

    The instrument applies the eight-dimension rubric, scores the three officia oratoris, identifies rhetorical devices, and places the speaker in the canonical lineage.

  4. 04

    Read with Cicero at your elbow

    Each dimension and identified device is paired with an actual Latin passage from Cicero, so you can see the modern figure measured against its classical model.

  5. 05

    Interpret, do not obey

    The score is a structured reading, not a verdict. Use the rationale, the devices, and the counsel to argue with the instrument — that is the scholarship.

The Workshop

How to workshop your own speech

  1. 01

    Write or paste your draft

    Open the Workshop and paste a speech you are writing — a wedding toast, a campaign opener, a pitch, a eulogy. Anything you are trying to make land.

  2. 02

    Receive the Cicero Score

    The same eight-dimension rubric evaluates your draft. You get the same score, officia, lineage, devices, and counsel that a canonical speech receives.

  3. 03

    Learn from Cicero directly

    Every weak dimension is paired with a Latin passage showing how Cicero handled that same move. You are not told to imitate him — you are shown what the standard looks like.

  4. 04

    Save and revise across drafts

    Your drafts persist between visits. Edit, re-score, compare versions, and watch the Cicero Score rise as you sharpen the argument, rhythm, and civic voice.

  5. 05

    Earn the certificate

    When your draft reaches a score you are proud of, generate a certificate. It records the title, score, and date — a small monument to craft.

Who it is for

Classicists & Rhetoricians

Operationalize Ciceronian theory on contemporary corpora. The rubric is a falsifiable rendering of De Oratore — argue with the weights, refine the dimensions, publish the readings.

Students of Rhetoric

Learn the canon by collision. Every dimension surfaces with a real Cicero passage; every device with a Latin parallel. Write your own speeches in the Workshop and watch the rubric become legible by doing.

Speechwriters & Communicators

Diagnose drafts in the Workshop. Paste your prose, get the Cicero Score, and read Cicero's own handling of your weakest dimensions. Revise across saved drafts until the score rises.

Journalists & Critics

Add a classical axis to political coverage. The instrument turns 'great speech' or 'flat speech' into specific, citable claims.

Teachers

Run a class corpus — Lincoln, Churchill, King, Obama, Reagan, a CEO keynote, a TED talk — and let students debate the scores. The rubric is the syllabus.

Curious Citizens

Recover an old habit: judging public speech by craft, not only by ideology. Cicero believed eloquence and citizenship were the same training. This is that exercise.

Reading a Report

  • Cicero Score

    A weighted 0–100 total across the eight dimensions. Every score earns a verdict — the same scale that appears on your certificate:

    ScoreVerdictMeaning
    90–100CiceronianWorthy of the canon — periodic, balanced, and ethically charged.
    80–89EloquentStylistically accomplished with clear classical lineage.
    70–79AccomplishedWell-crafted and effective; a few dimensions still uneven.
    60–69CompetentSound argument and structure; light on ornament and movement.
    50–59WorkmanlikeFunctional prose that delivers the point without lifting it.
    Below 50PlainClear but unadorned — an invitation to revise, not a failure.
  • Officia Oratoris

    The three classical duties — docere (instruct), delectare (delight), movere (move). A great speech does all three; most modern speeches collapse to one.

  • Lineage

    The orator the speech most resembles. Useful as provocation: if your CEO keynote channels Demosthenes, that is data; if it channels nobody, that is also data.

  • Dimensions & Devices

    Each score and each device is paired with an actual Cicero Latin passage. Read modern speech and ancient model side by side.

  • Counsel for the Orator

    Concrete suggestions for revision. Speechwriters can treat this as an editing pass; critics can treat it as a falsifiable claim.

Questions

Is the AI doing the thinking?
No. The eight dimensions, the rubric, and the Latin parallels are the scholarly substance. The AI applies the rubric the way a research assistant might — quickly and consistently. The interpretation is yours.
Why Cicero and not Aristotle?
Aristotle gave us ethos / logos / pathos. Cicero gave us those three plus a complete civic theory of style — the periodic sentence, amplificatio, the three officia, virtus civilis. Cicero is the canon that actually shaped Western political oratory from Burke to Lincoln to Churchill.
What kinds of texts work best?
Speeches meant to be heard — campaign addresses, eulogies, sermons, opening statements, keynotes. Memos, essays, and tweets work less well because they were not built for the ear.
Can two scores be compared?
Yes, but treat the comparison the way a critic treats two close readings: as an argument, not a measurement. The instrument is consistent enough to be productive and modest enough to be honest.
Why are some passages in Latin?
Because the model is Cicero, not a paraphrase of Cicero. Every dimension and every matched device shows the actual Latin source with translation, so the reading is anchored in the corpus, not in a vibe.

Now go and read

Score your first speech

Start with something you already know — a speech you love, or one you suspect is hollow. The instrument is most revealing when it agrees with you, and most useful when it does not.